Brandpay
Cluely Spent Millions on Industrial-Scale UGC. Here's How Any Brand Can Do It for Free
UGC Strategy

Cluely Spent Millions on Industrial-Scale UGC. Here's How Any Brand Can Do It for Free

Cluely hired 700+ creators and spent millions building an industrial-scale UGC machine. But what if you could achieve the same viral reach and customer engagement automatically—without the army of creators or the massive budget?

MH Michael Haywood

Michael Haywood

Co-founder & CEO · November 14, 2025 · 8 min read

Roy Lee didn’t just build a startup—he built a content empire.

The 21-year-old Cluely CEO went from 0 to $7M ARR in months by deploying what Silicon Valley is calling “the most audacious UGC strategy ever seen.” His approach? Hire 700+ content creators, pay 60+ people to live in San Francisco just to make videos, and produce 200+ pieces of content per day.

The results speak for themselves: 80 million views per month, billion-view campaigns, and a $15M funding round from Andreessen Horowitz.

But here’s the thing most brands miss when they read these headlines: You don’t need Cluely’s budget or army of creators to achieve similar results.

In fact, the future of industrial-scale UGC isn’t about hiring more people—it’s about automating customer advocacy. And that’s exactly what BrandPay was built to do.

What Cluely Got Right: The Industrial UGC Playbook

Before we talk about the automated alternative, let’s break down what made Cluely’s approach revolutionary:

1. Volume Over Perfection

Cluely’s philosophy is simple: if you make 100 different videos, one will go viral. If you repost that viral video across 100 accounts, 20-30 will go viral too.

They’re not chasing perfect content—they’re chasing statistical probability. More content = more chances to hit the algorithm lottery.

2. Performance-Based Incentives

According to reports, Cluely hired 700+ creators, producing 200+ videos per day, paying roughly $20-40 per video plus bonuses for viral hits. This aligns creator incentives with viral outcomes, not just follower counts.

When people are paid for performance, not vanity metrics, they optimize for what actually matters: engagement.

3. Content as Product, Not Marketing

While most companies treat content as a marketing expense, Cluely treats it like product iteration. They A/B test relentlessly, track what works, and double down on winners.

Roy Lee spent 1,000+ tweets in 3 months testing messaging, then built an internal CRM to manage 2,000+ content contributors. This isn’t content marketing—it’s content manufacturing.

4. Controversy as Distribution

Their infamous “dating video” where Roy used AI to lie during a date generated 7.8 million views and sparked massive controversy. Lee’s insight? “If half the audience doesn’t hate it, it’s not viral enough.”

Love it or hate it, polarizing content cuts through the noise.

The Problem: Most Brands Can’t Afford Cluely’s Approach

Here’s what the headlines don’t mention:

Cluely’s UGC operation costs millions of dollars.

  • Paying 700+ creators at $20-40 per video adds up fast
  • Managing 60+ full-time creators living in San Francisco? That’s a six-figure monthly burn rate
  • Building an internal CRM to coordinate 2,000+ contributors takes engineering resources most brands don’t have
  • $1,000 bonuses for viral content mean unpredictable costs that scale with success

For a venture-backed startup with a TechCrunch reported $15M in funding, this works. But for most brands—especially D2C companies trying to scale profitably—this model is completely inaccessible.

The real question isn’t “Can we replicate Cluely’s strategy?”

It’s “Can we achieve similar results without the massive overhead?”

The BrandPay Alternative: Automated Industrial-Scale UGC

What if you could deploy industrial-scale UGC without hiring a single creator or spending millions on content production?

That’s the insight behind BrandPay.

Instead of paying creators to manufacture content about your brand, BrandPay turns your existing customers into an automated content engine.

Here’s how it works:

1. Customers Post Naturally

Your customers are already posting about their lives on social media. With BrandPay, when they tag your brand, they automatically earn rewards—no application process, no creator contracts, no management overhead.

2. Performance-Based Rewards (Just Like Cluely)

Like Cluely’s $1,000 viral bonuses, BrandPay rewards performance. But instead of paying cash, you offer store credit that must be spent with your brand.

A customer who creates viral content earns more—but every dollar they earn cycles back into more purchases. You’re not just getting reach; you’re getting guaranteed revenue.

The data is clear: $1 in BrandPay rewards = $2.30 in return revenue.

3. Volume Through Automation, Not Headcount

Cluely produces 200+ videos per day by managing 700+ creators manually. BrandPay produces volume by automating the entire process across thousands of customers.

Every customer becomes a potential creator. Every mention becomes measurable. Every reward drives a purchase.

You get the volume without the operational complexity.

4. Always-On Content Manufacturing

Cluely’s content machine requires constant management—tracking creators, reviewing submissions, coordinating posting schedules, managing payments.

BrandPay runs automatically in the background, 24/7:

  • Customers post and get rewarded instantly
  • Engagement metrics track automatically
  • Rewards convert to purchases without any manual intervention

It’s industrial-scale UGC that scales without adding headcount.

The Math: Cluely vs. BrandPay

Let’s compare the two approaches side by side:

Cluely’s Approach

  • Cost per video: $20-40 + bonuses
  • Volume: 200+ videos/day = ~6,000/month
  • Monthly spend: $120K-$240K minimum (not including bonuses, housing, management overhead)
  • Content source: Hired creators
  • Revenue model: Indirect (drive app downloads and subscriptions)

BrandPay’s Approach

  • Cost per like or post: e.g. $0.20 per like, or $40 per post, in store credit (you set the limits)
  • Volume: Unlimited (every customer can post)
  • Monthly spend: Only what you budget, capped per creator
  • Content source: Real customers
  • Revenue model: Direct ($2.30 return per $1 rewarded)

The difference? Cluely spends millions to manufacture reach. BrandPay invests rewards that return as revenue.

One is a cost center. The other is a growth engine.

Why BrandPay Works Better for Most Brands

1. Authenticity > Production Value

Cluely’s content is polished and strategic. But for most brands, authenticity outperforms production value.

When real customers share genuine moments with your brand, it doesn’t feel like an ad—because it isn’t one. That’s why user-generated content converts 161% better than professional photoshoots.

BrandPay captures that authenticity at scale, automatically.

2. Sustainable Economics

Cluely’s model works when you have venture funding and exponential app growth. But most brands need profitable growth channels, not expensive experiments.

BrandPay’s closed-loop economics mean every dollar you invest returns more than double. You’re not spending on content—you’re investing in guaranteed future revenue.

3. Lower Risk, Higher Control

With Cluely’s approach, you’re dependent on creators showing up, producing content, and posting consistently. If your creators stop, your content engine stops.

With BrandPay, your customers are your creators. As long as you have customers, you have content. And since you set reward caps and limits, costs are always predictable and controlled.

4. Built for Long-Term Flywheels, Not Short-Term Spikes

Cluely’s strategy optimizes for viral spikes—massive view counts that drive app installs and media attention.

BrandPay optimizes for compounding customer-generated commerce—consistent content that drives purchases, loyalty, and repeat advocacy over time.

Cluely is built for venture-scale moonshots. BrandPay is built for sustainable, profitable growth.

What Cluely’s Success Proves (And What It Means for You)

Roy Lee’s achievement isn’t just impressive—it’s instructive. He proved that industrial-scale UGC isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s a competitive advantage.

The brands that treat content like a manufacturing process, not a marketing tactic, are winning. The brands that optimize for volume and velocity are breaking through.

But you don’t need Cluely’s budget or operational complexity to compete.

You just need a system that automates what Cluely does manually.

That’s BrandPay:

  • Performance-based rewards (like Cluely’s viral bonuses)
  • Industrial-scale volume (without the 700-person team)
  • Always-on content manufacturing (automated, not managed)
  • Profitable from day one ($2.30 return per $1 invested)

The Future of UGC Isn’t Manual—It’s Automated

Cluely spent millions building a content empire. They proved the model works.

Now it’s your turn—without the overhead, without the complexity, and without the massive budget.

BrandPay takes the best parts of Cluely’s strategy and makes it accessible to any brand:

  • Turn your customers into creators automatically
  • Reward performance with store credit that drives purchases
  • Scale to thousands of posts without scaling headcount
  • Build a content engine that’s profitable from day one

Ready to deploy industrial-scale UGC without the industrial-scale costs?

Book a demo to see how BrandPay automates customer advocacy at scale—or see how consumers earn by creating content for brands they love.


Related reading: You’re Right to Doubt UGCTurn Customers into Brand Advocates10 UGC Stats That Prove Social Commerce Is King

UGCAutomationCluelyContent MarketingCustomer Advocacy

Related posts